Foundiqo

Sample report

Sample Foundiqo SEO + GEO readiness report

A decision-grade report format for SEO foundations, AI answer readiness, proof, offers, prompt evidence, AI files, and customer fix planning.

Overall

72/100

Needs focused proof and offer work before relying on SEO + GEO signals.

SEO Foundation

81/100

Crawlable baseline with metadata and schema gaps.

GEO Readiness

64/100

Category and audience are clear, but answer-first pages are thin.

Proof & Trust

48/100

Claims need official evidence URLs and review owners.

Offer Clarity

57/100

Pricing and constraints exist but are not structured enough for AI agents.

AI Files

42/100

llms.txt and well-known JSON drafts are ready for review, not publish.

Evidence Table

FindingEvidenceImpactFix
Missing FAQPage schemaHomepage has FAQ copy but no FAQPage JSON-LD.AI systems may miss extractable answer blocks.Generate FAQPage schema and place it where the visible FAQ exists.
Weak claim proofThree differentiator claims have no official source URL.Citation confidence is lower because claims are unsupported.Create Proof Graph rows with evidence URL, excerpt, confidence, owner, and last-verified date.
No comparison context/compare and /alternatives are not found in the crawl set.Buyer-intent prompts may choose competitors with clearer tradeoff pages.Publish fair comparison pages with dated methodology and caveats.
Offer constraints unclearPricing text exists, but refund, eligibility, region, and support constraints are not structured.AI agents cannot safely recommend or hand off checkout.Build Offer Graph and Product/Offer schema before publishing commerce guidance.

Prompt Evidence Snapshot

Best tools to improve AI search visibility for SaaS

Brand mentioned: yes; cited: no

Why lost or incomplete: Missing official methodology page.

Alternatives to legacy SEO audit tools for GEO

Brand mentioned: no; competitor mentioned: yes

Why lost or incomplete: No comparison page or proof-backed differentiation.

Can an AI agent understand this product plan?

Brand mentioned: yes; actionable: partial

Why lost or incomplete: Offer constraints and approval guardrails need structure.

Fix Queue

P0Effort Low / Impact High

Publish reviewed methodology and scoring limits

P0Effort Low / Impact High

Approve Brand Brain facts and no-guarantee language

P1Effort Medium / Impact High

Attach evidence to top claims in Proof Graph

P1Effort Low / Impact Medium

Generate and validate llms.txt plus well-known JSON

P2Effort Medium / Impact Medium

Run weekly prompt capture for competitor and citation movement

This sample is a representative format, not a live audit of a named customer. Production reports include timestamp, audit ID, crawl scope, generated assets, prompt evidence, limitations, and human review status.